September 25, 2008
Sources: The Journal of Commerce Online
The ports of Los Angeles
and Long Beach have weathered initial legal challenges to their
clean-trucks programs and are poised to implement the plans
on Oct. 1.
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Wednesday denied a
request by the American Trucking Associations for a preliminary
injunction that would have blocked the concession requirements
in the clean-trucks programs. Beginning Oct. 1, only motor carriers
with port-issued concession agreements can serve the harbor.
In a separate action, the Federal Maritime Commission on Wednesday
announced that it will hold a formal investigation that will
look at nine specific provisions in the clean-trucks programs.
The order of investigation, however, does not prevent the ports
from implementing their clean-trucks programs. If the FMC intends
to block implementation, the commission would have to seek injunctive
relief in a U.S. District Court, but it does not appear that
the commission would do so by Oct. 1.
Therefore, it appears that beginning Oct.1, the ports will limit
access to their marine terminals to motor carriers that have
signed concession agreements. Drivers, as well, will have to
present a federal Transportation Worker Identification Credential
to terminal operators, or proof that they have applied for a
TWIC card.
Although the ports are free to impose a $35 per-TEU clean-truck
fee, the ports announced this week the computer system needed
to process the fee won't be ready until mid to late October.
They will then begin collecting the fee.
The 9th Circuit Court said the ATA did not present enough evidence
to warrant injunctive relief.
"Appellant has failed to establish that it will be irreparably
injured absent an injunction, or that the public interest lies
in favor of an injunction," the court stated.
The ATA had argued that the ports' concession requirements violate
the federal preemption statute that prohibits states and local
entities from actions that regulate the rates, routes and services
of motor carriers engaged in interstate commerce.
Although the appellate court intends to hear arguments from
the ports, the ATA and intervening parties, the timetable allows
the clean-trucks plans to begin on Oct. 1. The ATA must submit
its arguments by Oct. 8 and the ports must respond by Nov. 5.
The FMC's order of investigation indicates that the commission
has concerns about the Port of Los Angeles requirement that
motor carriers phase in over the next five years the hiring
of employee drivers. The Long Beach concession agreement would
allow the use of owner-operators as well as employee drivers.
The order of investigation will also seek more information on
provisions by the ports that will limit access to marine terminals
by certain motor carriers. Also, the FMC is requesting more
information on financial incentives offered by the Port of Los
Angeles to determine if some motor carriers would experience
discrimination in terms of assistance.
Peter King, acting FMC general counsel, said the order of investigation
does not prevent the ports from implementing their clean-trucks
plans on Oct. 1. An FMC administrative law judge will set a
date to receive formal testimony on the clean-trucks programs.
By: Bill Mongelluzzo



